Analysis of The "Get Smart Plus 4" Textbook from The Eil Perspectives

Authors

  • Muhammad Naufal Abbas Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Keningau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53840/ejbl.v5i1.127

Keywords:

Textbook Analysis from the EIL Perspectives

Abstract

Textbooks are crucial ELT resources for instructors and students to comprehend the subject being learned since they are filled with linguistic knowledge and cultural aspects. From the English as an International Language (EIL) perspective, English textbooks need to expose students to a variety of English language variations, including a variety of characters from different cultural backgrounds and a variety of cultural representations. This qualitative study employs a content analysis method to evaluate the extent to which the Get Smart Plus 4 textbook incorporates linguistic and cultural diversity. The research objective is to examine the textbook's content, including characters and language varieties, and assess its alignment with the goals of EIL and lingua-cultural dialogue. By analyzing the textbook's content, the study aims to identify the presence or absence of linguistic resources that implicitly display variation in English varieties. The findings reveal that while the textbook includes characters from various cultural and geographic origins, it tends to favour the inner circle form of English, thereby overlooking other English varieties. This absence of linguistic resources undermines the goal of EIL, which stresses the importance of lingua-cultural dialogue. These findings highlight the need for ELT materials to foster a broader range of English language variations to promote a more inclusive and culturally diverse learning environment.

References

Abd Aziz, M. S., & Mohamad Uri, N. F. (2017). CEFR in Malaysia: Current issues and challenges in the implementation of the framework. The 3rd International Conference on Language Testing and Assessment and the 5th British Council New Directions in Language Assessment Conference, 2–3.

Al-Sofi, B. (2018). An evaluation of the cultural aspects in the university English textbook, Well-Read 1. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8, 184. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0802.02

Aman, N., & Tan, L. (2018). The nuts and bolts of English grammar. Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd.

Bose, P., & Gao, X. (2022). Cultural representations in Indian English language teaching textbooks. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082102

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel & M. H. Long (Eds.), Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.

Hadi, M., & Shah, P. (2020). Malaysian ESL teachers’ perception towards CEFR-aligned textbooks. International Journal of New Technology and Research, 6. https://doi.org/10.31871/IJNTR.6.10.23

Hamid, M. O., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2016). Globalization, English language policy, and teacher agency: Focus on Asia. International Education Journal, 15(1), 26–43.

Hutchinson T., & Torres E (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal,48(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.4.315

Li, G. (2017). Preparing culturally and linguistically competent teachers for English as an International Language education. TESOL Journal, 8, 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.322

Marlina, R. (2018). Teaching English as an International Language: Implementing, reviewing, and re-envisioning world Englishes in language education. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Marlina, R. (2021). International perspectives on diversity in ELT. In D. L. Benegas, G. Beacon, & M. P. Berbain (Eds.), Let’s play “Sok says”, not “Simon says”: Evaluating the international and intercultural orientation of ELT Materials for Cambodian Secondary Schools (pp. 73–90). Palgrave Macmillan.

Matsuda, A. (2012). Teaching materials in EIL. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. McKay, G. Hu, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for Teaching English as an International Language (pp. 168–185). Routledge.

McKay, S. L. (2018). English as an International Language: What it is and what it means for pedagogy. RELC Journal, 49(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738817

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Mittmann, B. (2011). Prefabs in spoken English. In T. Herbst, S. Faulhaber, & P. Uhrig (Eds.), The phraseological view of language: A tribute to John Sinclair (pp. 197–210). De Gruyter Mouton.

Naji Meidani, E., & Pishghadam, R. (2013). Analysis of English language textbooks in the light of English as an International Language (EIL): A comparative study. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.163

Nguyen, T. T. M., Marlina, R., & Cao, T. H. P. (2021). How well do ELT textbooks prepare students to use English in global contexts? An evaluation of the Vietnamese English textbooks from an English as an international language (EIL) perspective. Asian Englishes, 23(2), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2020.1717794

Rose, H., & Galloway, N. (2019). Global Englishes for language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316678343

Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.

So’od, S. M. M., Hua, T. K., & Hamid, B. A. (2020). Cyberbullying through intellect—Related insults. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(1), Article 1. http://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/37734

Tajeddin, Z., & Pakzadian, M. (2020). Representation of inner, outer and expanding circle varieties and cultures in global ELT textbooks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00089-9

Takal, G. M., Planisamay, T., Ibrahim Gani, N. A., Peter, C. V., & Rahmat, A. (2021). An evaluation of ‘Get smart’ English language textbook from the perspectives of English teachers. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 7(2), 727. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.7.2.727-746.2021

Downloads

Published

2023-05-30

How to Cite

Abbas, M. N. (2023). Analysis of The "Get Smart Plus 4" Textbook from The Eil Perspectives. E-Jurnal Bahasa Dan Linguistik (e-JBL), 5(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.53840/ejbl.v5i1.127